Bible Believers' Newsletter 305
"We focus on the present Truth – what Jesus is doing now. . ."
Christian greetings in the precious Name of our Lord Jesus Christ; we're together again, just praising the Lord!
In this issue we have two guest contributors. Australian author Alan Gourley has striven for decades to introduce the 'real world' to those who want to know what is really going on. Some of his early books may be read or downloaded from the Natural Resources area of the Church Website whilst some of his more recent writings may be accessed from his own website, themindweb.com. We are quoting from his latest: "Think! What it could do for You".
Our second guest is Israeli-born musician and writer, Gilad Atzmon, who regards himself as a devoted political artist and sees the country of his birth as an 'immoral, colonialist terrorist state' whose people are 'kidnapped by their own victim mentality.' He supports the liberation of the Palestinian people. In his writings on the issue, Gilad suggests a solution of one state for the many people based on equality and democracy.
With Ariel Sharon agreeing to recognize a provisional Palestinian State in 2004 crowded into separated colonies that will constitute about ten percent of the original territory of Palestine before 1948 and the ongoing affront to Islam by the political Zionists (or apostate once Christian West), we may anticipate World War III will soon develop into the 'hot' war planned by the 'Hidden Hand' in the nineteenth century, and the continuing deception of the Semitic people of Palestine, both Hebrews and Arabs, by this golem. The sinking of Los Angeles and the close of the Gentile dispensation draws nigh.
Each contributor in his own way declares how the 'Hidden Hand' by deception has enslaved men's minds so that they no longer think as individuals but react as a collective and thus, like "human cattle," are made defenseless. They confirm Jesus' prophecy regarding the spirit of Laodicea, which means "people's rights," and is the spirit of Communism that has overcome the whole world. Lord Bertrand Russell once said, "Many people would rather die than thinkin fact most do!"
This Newsletter serves those of like precious faith and whosoever will receive the truth is welcome to feed their soul from the waters of the River of Life. Everything presented should be confirmed personally in your own Bible.
Religious Restrictions or Religious Censorship in America?
December 26, 2003 Sadly, burning the American flag is considered free speech; but erecting crosses as roadside memorials is not. The Federal Communications Commission allows the "F-word" on television, but thanking God at a high school graduation is a big no-no. And some schools freely dispense condoms to kids, but pencils that read "Jesus loves little children" were confiscated from a 1st-grade class in Virginia. While some look at these examples and see some necessary need to keep religion out of public life, many others believe (with good reason) that they are signs of religious censorship. "War on Christianity" . . . But those on the other side of the battle . . . think otherwise. Full story: foxnews.com
Hungarian President refuses to sign Legislation Outlawing Criticism of Jews
December 25, 2003 Recently, Jews living in Hungary were able to push through a law, adopted earlier this month by parliament, stipulating that any person who publicly expresses hatred toward Jews could face three years in prison. And, someone who publicly insults a Jew could be found guilty of a misdemeanor and sentenced to up to two years of imprisonment.
The Jews were very disappointed that the law was accepted by only a slim majority of just four votes with 184 parliamentarians saying yes, while 180 said no. Now, in a surprise development, President Ferenc Madl said he refuses to sign the hate speech legislation because the bill could "restrict freedom to a greater extent than is constitutionally permissible." . . . Full story: fpp.co.uk
Human Programming by False Information
By Alan Gourley
About fifty years ago a book called "1984" was published by George Orwell. It was about the coming "New World Order." The writer had been a socialist supporter but his intelligence showed him, at least to some extent, what was really going on. However, as with many of us who look into the future, he expected events rather more quickly than they arrived. He should have called his book "2002". He cloaked it in fiction for fear of reprisal because he did not see that the culture he wanted to expose had the strength and confidence to ignore him.
Of course the thought police were active in 1984 but we are really only seeing the consequences of their world-wide efforts today. It is only in recent times that we find children informing on their parents and having them charged for humanist offences.
A newspaper columnist, Janet Albrechtsen, (October 2003) starts her column: "Zealotry is gagging our language and bowdlerizing our humor." Let's not waste time with examples as I am sure that you, wherever you are in an English-speaking country, have ample opportunity to see examples of words being outlawed or meanings changed and ridiculous substitutions offered in the name of equality of sex, race, age or other equal nonsense. The degradation of childhood by (increasingly expensive) government education is world-wide.
This program varies according to culture and is designed to divorce people from their culture so that they can be deprived of rights and abused, or charged with offences for speaking the ever-present truth, but people, even in poor circumstances, often try to fight back. See: "Why Johnny Can't Think." A revealing read.
It's not just about beliefs and words going down the memory hole, it's about removing words that help us to explain situations accurately. Common reasons given are that some words indicating race, culture or sex in some way demean humans but in fact it is humanists who demean human by suppressing honest thought and flexibility of speechhumanists fear the honesty of truth.
Humans do not need to be put in a protective cage by narrow-minded egoists' who are afraid of truth. Truth can defend itself if given freedom to do so. Humanism defends the immoral, the blasphemous and any cancerous sicknesses that may be used to help promote human deformity by deformity of truth. Vitriol and violent expressions of zealotry are part of all sick and deformed promotions! These expose the true nature of Humanism.
The vicious nature of zealotry comes from fear of truth! When we become addicted to a false cause; our conscience knows it will lose a fair fight so our defense becomes violence. Whereas truth, on the other hand, is prepared to stand alone in confidence that it can prove itself against lies and has no need to use suppression by force.
These enforcers of zealotry may be well educated, they may be professors, but as my Grandfather would have said, "An educated fool is still a fool." In those "down to earth" days many everyday people could recognize stupidity even if those involved were rich or famous.
In relation to science-based human reprogramming experiments it seems an early use of this science was in the USSR. We used to hear about mass media propaganda and of how Russians were brainwashed but, like parents scoffing at other parents, we could not see we ourselves were already on a similar, if more subtle and more refined, program.
So a world power establishment wanting to own the world only had to teach people to adore a false humanity and to love their children to death. That is not difficult because it is what parents want by animal instinct and we were taught that we are just animals.
But humans are not just animals; we are not just biological mechanisms governed only by behavior programmed instincts. We are not devoid of intelligent choice and the understanding of consequences. We are vitally different.
Once Globalists saw that cultures and civilizations can be controlled by false beliefs then, especially when power is worldwide, they can see that this knowledge is a way to gain ownership of the entire world without danger to themselves. But they cannot allow for the fact that their own false premises undermine their own thinking.
If we encourage young children to develop their own personalities without ancestral experience to guide them, they naturally follow their animal instincts. If their earliest experience and most personal observation teaches them that they cannot trust their parents for intelligent guidance they look elsewhere. If then educators tell them that they must please themselves and live for what pleasure they can get out of life, then they are back in the junglegenerations of humanizing experience and understanding is lost.
Yes humans learn humanity! We develop by help of parents and culture! If our culture frees us of authority to be other than instinct directs, then whatever beliefs we finally accept is just a matter of animal instinct, peer group comforts or arrogant leadership.
Less than one hundred years ago most parents could see the value of instilling cultural experience into their children even if it did occasionally mean inflicting a little pain. In their love of their children the great majority knew physical punishment hurt them more than it hurt their children but not only did they make this sacrifice for their children's future but, in the great majority, the children were pleased to know that parents cared enough for them to give them firm guidance.
If someone says that love and pain cannot be interchanged, that Christianity forbids punishment, then you know that they are not prepared to suffer for love. These will find when their time comes that they should have tried more honestly to know their Creator. Past parents may not have understood that good parenting was a matter of loving truth for their children's benefit, but progressive healthy children gave them joyful reward for their sacrifices.
Of course it was inevitable that some zealous parents got it wrong and some children were excessively or unjustly punished. So parental failure created some rebellious children and some of these grew into zealous adults happy to turn against what they did not understand and did not want to understand. But our mistakes are something from which we should learn. We should turn our stumbling blocks into stepping stones.
So those who hunger for power and scheme to own the world found that they did not need to plan to fight a physical war or endanger their own families. They need only seduce by lies and deceit. The deceived sacrifice with pride. Parents will do their best to deliver their children back to the Stone Age and confine them to cultural enslavement, misery and short lifetime in the name of "letting them develop their own personalities" before their children have the maturity and humanizing experience to understand their more beneficial alternatives.
Around a century ago, in the more advanced nations, many parents would not have fallen for this trick because they lived by a basically Christian philosophy that included responsible values and responsibility for the values their children inherited. So by promoting evil as love, ignorance as self-development and truth, all these as matters of social choice, our world is delivered into sickness and darkness. We then fear to face the light of truth because it exposes what we have allowed to happen.
Slavish following of peer groups, political parties, sports and various fashions of primitive behavior are not signs of independent thinking but true evidence of intellectual enslavement. However if we face the truth and act to reclaim it, the fault can be repaired and the lost can be redeemed. Full text: Think!
Zionists and Christ Killers
By Gilad Atzmon
Zionists are annoyed when they are blamed for the death of Jesus. (I am referring here to the Jewish American organisations' reaction to Mel Gibson's "The Passion of Christ." Many people around the world regarded the Israeli siege of the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem as an attempt to kill Jesus 'again').
I would suggest that perhaps we should face it once and for all: the Jews were responsible for the killing of Jesus who, by the way, was Himself a Palestinian Jew. But then two questions should be asked:
1. How is it that people living today feel accountable or chased for a crime committed by their great great great ancestors almost 2,000 years ago? I assume that those Jews who get angry when blamed for killing Jesus are those who identify themselves with Jesus' killers. Those who would commit this murderous act today. Those Jews are called Zionists and they are already advancing into their sixth decade of inhuman crimes against the Palestinian people and the Arab world. Zionism, for those who do not know, is a repetition of the darkest age of the Jewish Biblical era. It isn't that surprising therefore that Zionists have selected the most suicidal chapters in Jewish history (such as Masada and Bar Cochva) and turned them into the pillars of their reborn culture. On the other hand, we must praise the Zionists for being consistent. Zionists claim that the whole of Palestine belongs to the Jews because their Jewish ancestors lived there 2,000 ago. Jews attempting to live on confiscated Palestinian lands nowadays regard themselves as the same Jews who lived in Palestine two millennia ago. This must explain why Zionists are so offended when they are blamed for the actions of Judas. They are offended because they are all Judases. Might I remind the reader that the Judases of today are armed with hundreds of nuclear weapons without being signed to any international control treaty.
2. Why is it that the Jews who repeatedly demand that the Christian world should apologise for its involvement in previous persecutions, have never thought that it is about time that they apologised for killing Jesus? I wouldn't ask the Italians to apologise on behalf of the Romans for their part in Christ's killing simply because Italians do not feel remotely offended when Romans are blamed for it. I merely suggest that if a Jew feels offended when accused, this reveals attachment to the perpetrators. It might be the right time for the Jewish state to ask for forgiveness on behalf of the Jewish people for their immoral behaviour.
I assume that the following lingual fact isn't known to most Gentiles. Jews do not use the name 'Jesus' when referring to Christ. Instead, they use the Hebrew word 'Yeshu' which means "may his name and memory be erased for ever" (yeshuYimach Shemo Vzichro). I do want to believe that most ordinary Jews are not familiar with the etymology of the name Yeshu. In the Jewish hierarchy of insults this is the gravest and most disrespectful. This combination of words is usually attached to Hitler and evils of his calibre. Jesus, it would appear, is considered by Jewish spiritual leaders as the embodiment of all evil. I ask myself, if Jesus was as bad as Hitler (in the eyes of the rabbis), why is it that the Jews are so offended when blamed for killing him? Why don't they regard his killing as the most glamorous chapter of their history?
Zionists are always outraged when they are equated with Nazis. They will say that to claim 'yesterday's victims are today's perpetrators' is a form of 'Holocaust denial' and will argue that describing Israel as the root of all evil justifies the Holocaust. With great shame I have to agree that Israel's behaviour throws some light on the persecution of Jews throughout history. Perhaps it is time to dispose of the notion of 'Holocaust denial'.
Westerners are very concerned not to be associated with any form of Holocaust denial. In some countries Holocaust denial is treated as a criminal offence. For years I have argued that Holocaust denial is not a particularly interesting subject because as a notion it is far too wide. In practice, anyone who tries to oppose the official Zionist interpretation of World War II events instantly becomes a 'Holocaust denier'. Some Zionists went so far as to accuse Roberto Benigni of Holocaust denial when he made his masterpiece, "Life is Beautiful".
It is true that for quite a while the Zionists were fairly successful. They managed to stop the world from studying its history. Few people in Germany, in Israel or anywhere else know about the extensive collaboration between the Zionists and the Nazis before and during World War II. I am not a historian and the question of whether 6 million or rather 5,500,000 Jews died in the Holocaust is not really my major concern. For me, the act of killing is a catastrophe and 'state organised serial killing' is an unbearable and colossal catastrophe. Accordingly, the form of Holocaust denial that really bothers me is the denial of the on-going Palestinian Holocaust. This Holocaust is documented and covered daily by the western media. The turning of residential Palestinian cities into concentration camps; the deliberate starvation of the Palestinian population; the withholding of medical aid from Palestinian civilians; the wall that tears the holy land into isolated cantons and Bantustans; the continuous bombardment of civilians by the IDFare known to us all. This Holocaust is committed by the Jewish state with the support of world Jewry. This Holocaust, despite being well documented, is largely ignored. This is the most serious form of Holocaust denial. Moreover, I would suggest that the Zionists promote the issue of Holocaust denial so as to spread heavy smoke in an attempt to hide their own atrocities. The Zionists are the ones to be blamed for committing a holocaust and being the first to deny it.
Israel and the Zionist venture are principally responsible for any anti-Jewish outrage. It is time for Jews to stand up against their nationalistic movement. It is time for the world to stand up against the Zionist crime. As we learn from a recent EU poll, 58 per cent of Europeans regard Israel as the biggest threat to world peace. They are right. The Jewish state must be stopped and the sooner the better.
At this point some Zionists would try to revise their argument and claim that real anti-Semitism is in fact a form of blind hatred towards Jews regardless of their politics and misdoings. They would say that a Jew is hated just for being a Jew. My response would be that though such hatred might exist it needn't be labeled 'anti-Semitism'. It is xenophobia, defined by the Oxford Dictionary as an 'intense dislike or fear of foreigners or strangers'. Perhaps Jews aren't so unique after all. (Author's website). nl305.htm
Pass it on . . . please send this article to someone you know
Brother Grigor-Scott is a non-denominational minister who has ministered full-time since 1981, primarily to other ministers and their congregations overseas. He pastors Bible Believers' tiny congregation, and is available to teach in your church.